This criminal revision challenged the legality of an order framing charges. The High Court found no illegality and dismissed the revision without interference. The judgment consists of a brief order dismissing the petition.
Criminal revision dismissed with no interference in the order framing charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Q?
SingleBencfi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CI—EIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. LI 23 Cr. R. NO; /20g4
APPL ICANTS ACCUSED PERSONS
Devnath alpta s/o Late Muneshwar Prasad Gupta, age 58 years.
Pawan Kumar s/o Deonath Prasad GApta, age 2O years.
Shanti Devi w/o Deonath Prasad Gupta, age 4O years.
All r/o village Guturma, P.S. sitapur, Distt. surguja, C.G.
VERSUS
NON-APPL ICAN‘I‘ u The State of Chhattisgarh, through P.S. Sitapur, Distt. Surguja, C.G.
CRIMENAL REVIEION UNDER SECTION 35’7/49/Ji/OF THE CODE OF CR IMINAL PR OCED‘URE .
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR Cr. R.NO.42312004
DevnathGupta
PawanKumar
VERSUS
NON—APPLICANT
The StateofChhattisgarh
,CRIMINAL REVISIONUNDER SECTION 397/401 OF THECODE OF CRIMINALPROCEDURE. vV ‘5 (SB:Hon’bleMr.T.P.Sharma,J.)
:» Present—Mr.AK.Prasad,Advocatefortheapplicants. £Mr.S.R.J.Jaiswal,P.L.fortheState/non—applicant.
‘
ORDER (Passedon 1 1704/2012)
1:1 By this criminal revision under Section 897/401 of the Code of 1 CriminalProcedure, 1973, applicantshavechallengedthe legality and proprietyoftheorderframingchargedated10/8/2004passed V by 3rdAdditionalSessionsJudge,AmbikapurDistrictSurguja,CIG, in SessionTrialN0.276/2004
1//.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was any illegality in the order framing charge requiring interference under revisional jurisdiction.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Devnath Gupta
Pawan Kumar
Shanti Devi
The State of Chhattisgarh
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
