The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a criminal revision under S. 397 read with S. 401 CrPC on 10/2004 for want of prosecution, as the counsel admitted lack of instructions from the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
€§FEEt¢
‘ {\ VD)! ‘<br>" i2
’il s a. a§ 5
a e {a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) ‘3; § CriminalRevisionNo. of 2004. Applicant Dukhu Ram Gupta age'83 years S/o Late Shri Hari Prasad Gupta Complainant: Occupation Agriculturist Kawardha, Tah. & Distt. Kawal‘dha (Kabirdham) (C.G.) VERSUS x Non-Applicant Jagdish Ram age 32 years S/o Shri Aghnu Sahu Occupation 1 ‘27. ........‘‘ Agriculturist Jewadankala,fg:l‘ah.&Distt.Kawardha, W(C.G.) < . e .....Criminal Revision under section 397 read with section 401 of code of \ 'r‘v _. W i i“ Ate Criminal Procedure. 1973 . Eu r
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 354 of 2004
Applicant Complainant:
Dukhu Ram
NON-APPLICANT Jagdish Ram
CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973. (SB.Hon’bleMr T.P.Sharma, J.) Present Mr H B Agrawal Sr Advocate With Ms Sauna Khan Advocate for the apphcant Ncne for the non-applicant. x ORDER {Passedon 1 1 [04/ 2012) By this criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cod€ of Criminal Procedure, 1973, applicant has challenged the legah'ty and propriety of the order dated 5/ 5/ 2004 passed by Addmonal D1stmct Judge (FTC) Kawardha C G m case No 02/ 2004 Lemued counsel for the applicant submits that he is not having any instruction from the applicant. Consequently, the criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
fr
J j
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 CrPC should be allowed in the absence of instructions from the applicant.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dukhu Ram
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
