In a criminal revision challenging the confiscation of paddy by the Collector (Food) and Sessions Judge, the High Court found no illegality in the impugned orders regarding possession and displaced control.
The revision was dismissed, affirming the confiscation of the sale proceeds of the paddy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
, r r
“A
lN THE H GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CI-EIATTISGARH) ’ cRxMINAL REVISION N¢./§Q,} OF2003
MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL REVISEON UNDER SECTION 3f) WQ/ READ WITH SEC-mom 401 OF cr.P.c.
Page 2 of 2 Cr.R.No.127/2oo3
the amount/sale proceed shall be conhscated. 7/7/22rf”
“gal—
ex '
, T.?.Sha"‘“"‘
/’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision court committed any illegality in confirming the confiscated order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M.P. State Ware Housing Corporation
Chhattisgarh State Civil Supply Corporation
T. 9. Shri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
