This single bench criminal revision dismissed the application challenging a conviction under Section 354 IPC. The court found no illegality in the conviction and sentencing, observing that the conviction would not affect the applicant's government service despite his prayer for a protective order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,»>'\
IN THE Hluu'cu‘a¥‘uy JUD-
“ ‘ CRIMINAL REVISION No. 7 2002
AggLICINT: Jagdish Singh son of Shri Randhir Singh, aged about #6 years; occupation: Government Service (Dresser, Health Department ) resident of Kodaghat, pfesently posted at Gitv Dispensary, Akal£éra, Dis%: JanjgirZChampa(C.G).
Versus
NON-APPLINT:‘CA The State of Chhattisvarh Tdrough District Magistrate, 3anjéiri0hampé. P.S. Janjgir ( C.G.)
CRIMINAL REVISION qégr 5gg Vand 401 O? Cr.P.C.
“\ G@
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH BILASPUR
Criminal RevisionNo.118of2002
APPLicANT: Jagdish Singh
Versus
The State ofChhattisgarh NON—APPLICANT:
{CriminalrevisionunderSection397and401ofCr.P.C.}
Present:
Mr.AbhijitSarkar,counselfortheapplicant.
Mr. VinodKumarTekam,PanelLawyerfortheState.
"’‘ Single Bench:Hon’bleMr.T.P.Sharma,J ‘ ‘ ORDER
. s ‘
(6-9-2012)
Soma
f Sd/— V T.P. Sharma Judge ,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction under Section 354 IPC affects the applicant's government service
Whether the criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. reveals any illegality in the conviction and sentence
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagdish Singh
The State of Chhattisgarh
T. P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
