State v. Rajmani Rai
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge criminal revision regarding the dismissal of charges due to limitation period lapse. Court held no scope for interference and dismissed the revision.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed on limitation grounds.
What the court decided
H IHHIH W
CF0000080796
)
IN TEE HIGH COURT 9? JUD CATURE AT' JABALPUR. cmminal ReusionNo. {bf-I” Ou9J9F‘17 ix ) APPELLANT‘ 3 State of Madhya Prad‘esh‘ ;. -VERS USJ RESPéNDENT S RaJmam. aai D/omeer Bahadur Rai aged 65 years, R/o Kosgyeg. Pasg / swarsong Distte Dardling. West Bexiégoi a.‘ ' - CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397 4 01 READ WITH SECTION
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 1205 of 1997
APPELLANT
State of Madhya Pradesh
Versus
RESPONDENT
Rajmani Rai
CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397/401 READ WITH SECTION 482 CR. P.C..
(SB:Hon’bleMr.T.P.Sharma,J.)
Present:Mr. Suryakant Mishra, P.L. for the State/applicant.
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision is maintainable to challenge an order of discharge based on limitation.
Whether the High Court can interfere with the order of discharge on limitation grounds.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State of Madhya Pradesh
- respondent
Rajmani Rai
- respondent
D/o Meer Bahadur Rai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/1205/1997
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court