Dismissed
Maharu Ram Jolhe and Ors. v. Nagendra Pratap Koshaley and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCCRMP/618/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nots »?<s:l
6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR
Cr.M.P.NO. ^<S / 2011
PETITIONERS
APPLICANTS
^.<^r
^^:^ 3) Smt. TarkeshwariW/o Maharu Ram ».^.^^ aged about 40 years, V,y ^..^T>&-" AU are resident of ViUage Him, Tah^l & P.g, Sargagarh, Dlstrlet Raigarh (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS:
S/o RoshaQ tel aged about 2§yeass, Dinesh S/o Arjun aged about 20 years, respondent No.l & 2 are Resident of viUage Hirri, P.S. & Tahsil Saraagarh, District Raigarh (£.&.)
State of C.G. Through Police Station Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Sub Divisional OfGcer PoUce Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Superintend of Pollce Halgarh District Raigarh (C.G.)
PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973
The petitiohers named above most humbly and respectfully beg to submit as under :
JIA^^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Misc. Petition No.618^f201l
PETITIONERS/: 1. Maharu Ram Jolhe (Applicants) 2. Samaru Jolhe 3. Smt. Tarkeshwari Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Nagendra Pratap Koshaley 2. Dinesh 3. StateofC.G. 4. Sub Divisional Officer Police 5. Superintendent of Police
{Petition under Section 482 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973}
Present:
Mr. Manoj Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, counsel for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sudhir Bajpai, Deputy Govt.Advocate forthe State/respondents No.3, 4 and 5.
Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J
ORDER (4-4-2012)
Sd/-
T.P. Sharma Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR should be quashed when it is filed as a case to counter another FIR already lodged resulting in two cases.
Maharu Ram Jolhe
Samaru Jolhe
Smt. Tarkeshwari Jolhe
Nagendra Pratap Koshaley
Dinesh Koshaley
State of C.G.
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court