This court disposed of a writ petition filed by a retired employee of SECL seeking correction of his date of birth. The court examined evidence and concluded the older date was correct.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SIIISLtT^. ^ f!-. ^ ^v ^ ^ ' ^^Bts'fe? ?...[. .^ ••.^^t ^
c^ 1 erax
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION fS) No. ^aSX /2008
PETITIONER
^y/
"•6^^
^^/
/^^^/v
.-••'^'\y
•-€
^••?-
^';.«s"
'^y
RESPONDENTS /1
•/;2.
3;
/^-
/ JoiddhaPrasad Sahu, aged about 55 years, S/o GTilam Prasad, R/o Qr. No, 1/3 Dhhlwadeeh Project, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.)
VERSUS
South Eastern Coal.field Limited, Throygh TBe Ghairman Cum Managing Director, South Eastern Coal fields Hmited, Seepat Road Bilaspur (C.G.) The.BireGtor.fPersiQnnel), S.E.C.L. Seepat ^RoadSilaspur (C.G.) The Elept.tty^GeneralManagerS.E.G.L Dhhelwadeeh, Sirighali Project, Post BankimpngFa, District Korba (C.G.) ThePersonnel officer S.E.C.L Dhhelwadeeh, Project, Tahsil KatgHora, District Korba (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 AND 2270FTHE
CONSTITUTION OFINDIA
B
Ba
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BLLA_SPUR
(Hon. Mr. Justice PritinkerDiwaker) Writ Petition (S) No.7052 of 2008
PETITIONER Joiddha Prasad Sahu
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS South Eastern Coal Field Ltd. and ors.
Shri Rajesh Chand counsel for the petitioner. Dr.N.K, Shykla learned Sr. counset with ShriShailendra Shukla for the respondents.
p
WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA J
ORDER (01.09.2011)
Present petition relates t6 correction in date of birth of the petitioner who was an employee of SEGL and retired on 30.6.2008 from the post of Pump Khalasi.
B
inl
^5:?2te> "s""^ 1 ''^^.^ ^fg
--2.—
and mechanicat manner without assigningany reason and thereby rejected hjs representation. He submits that the age determination committee was under obligatibn to consider all aspects of the case andpass a detailed order inviewof 1.1. 76. By way of rejoinder also, the petitioner has filed annexure P-7 showing that his educational qualification is 7 standardand therefore beforethe age determination committee he has submittedthe mark sheet of7 lilass and the same ought to have been considered and'the petitioner under no circumstance couldsubmit the mark sheet of Higher Secondary as he has not taken education up to that standard.
..,...^.,..,.ABfe^E£»--^--.=^^
rn^^^^3"'t^.^-v^v \
a8pnf
ja'}[BMiQ jaquiiuj
-VS •
. i , ,
•yons se pessiiusip s.i iipuBpsssiLusip sq oi siqeii si eouej.sqns tno^iM 6uisq uoiutsd ai|}'iinsai 94} u| • 6
•SLUBS ayt 4iiM aje^etui
0}]jnoo si4»joiuoseej ou aq otsjeeddesjeiitpuetoejjoo sig^si'Z'l se g lujoj u.i peuoitysiu iiyiqp 3}epS!L| ley} jsuoi^adsqt BUIIUJO^U! p8u6ndLui jspjo 941 }eq) uoiuido psjopisuoo sqtjo si ynoo s\ift eseo 9i|»p seoueisujnojio pue s}3Bj ai<} ||E psjepisuoo snqi BuiAei-j •9
•jesjeo 931AJ3S Sj4 ^o pue fiejaq} )B.IO }U9LuaJ!}9J siq sjojsqsjeaA MS^ E }snf p96uB40 eq 0} psMO||e aq tOUUEoaoiAjes 94} (06 tueAjas }uaLuujaAo6 eift qoi4M jo siseq 3i|} uo spjooej }U9LUUJSAOB ui uogoejjoo (64} puBJoejeasoiAjes siiip pue Gei syite yjjiqjo etep^o s6uei(ojo^ A|dde 0} psujiujed aq }OU||IM seAoiduje ue}eq} p8|H9S ||3M si »| • L
c
"8fr6l."Z"l s.i W\qio Q}ep 8.14 tei|i sjeadde }i OS|B etues 84} uiojj pue jeuoiiiied eq} ^o pjooaj eoiAjes SJ.4U9 94t uMoys os|e sey luepuodssj siy joj issunoo -peuBndLui jspjo 94} 4}iM punej eq ueo unej ou eseo 94} pssouBtSiunojio '9SBO pUB StOB^ 94} ^BUUeplSUOO SL|} JO S}39dSB |en}3B^ 94} yt.im 6ui|e9p ai.iqM jepjo e)Bjoqe|8 AJSA Epsssed }ou 354 aeHiLULUoo uoiieuiiujetap e6e eqi 'qBnoyi "QfrSI.'Z'l. si Jsuoiiiisd ei)} p yyiq ^o 9}ep PSJJOO leqi pue psAeiieqeq touueo eLues aifl tey} uoisnpuoo 94KB 6u.iAuje3joj9q98HiLuiuo3 uoiiBuiLujaisp a6e sq} Aq pejepisuoo useq SAei) ASII} pue ZS61."9"SZ SB UMoys useq SEI< jauosBed eq}
z
&^ ^^•^'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contention of wrong date of birth by the petitioner reflected in the service book is correct?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Joiddha Prasad Sahu
South Eastern Coal Fields Limited
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
