Dismissed

Adheen Sai Benjaar and Ors. v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC1 Sept 2011WP/2127/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a single Judge of the High Court of Jharkhand at Bilaspur dismissed a writ petition filed by Adheen Sai Benjaar challenging an order for recovery of dues. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted to file appeal to the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, within three weeks.

Adheen Sai Benjaar and Ors. Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2011)

¶1

\09‘^/

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J'UDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)

¶3

W.P. No.^2I2§L /2oo3

¶4

PETITIONER

¶5

:/Adheen Sai Benjaar. t/ aged about 45 years V S/o Ujjawal Sai Benjaar, ’ Posted as Lower Division Teacher Goverhment Higher Secondary School, *\ Tapkara Distt. Jashpurnagar (Chhattisgarh) R/o Tapkara, Distt. Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

i N“ ,r._ , State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary Department of Tribal welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School // Tapkara District— Jashpurnagar (Chhattisgarh) ,.3 Tilak Kuwar Ram S/o Not known, ' aged about 25 years, Hostel Superintendent Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tapkara R/o Village Tapkara District— Jashpurnagar (Chhattisgarh) ~ Collector (Tribal wrIEare,) Jashpur (C.G.)

¶8

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22' OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRCTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS:

¶9

2 .../.3 mmwP Vi²⁰⁰

¶10

‘	‘mmqahw mmm	n mw§wm
am$		animm
	SB:<br>Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Di 01.09.2011: Shri Varun Sharma counsel Shri Chandresh Shrivastava Shri N.K. Malviya counsel for	Waker tor the petitioner. PL for the respondents 1, 2 and 4. respondent No.3
l *0WW	Challenge in this petition is passed by respondent No.2 i.e. Prir Tapkara, District Jashpur directin petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner sut the entire amountsought to be rec< Counsel for the respondents submit appeal before the Assistant Commi which he ought to have availed first. Counsel for the petitioner, at to withdraw this petition with liberty t< Tribal Welfare Department, JashpL authority to decide the appeal preferr To all this, counsel for the responden Accordingly, the petition is aforesaid. lf the petitioner prefers an 2 Welfare ”Department, Jashpur within , “mfamaw-FS/l40—2/201 1-1 ,50,000.	o the order dated 1.2.2003 (Annexure P—18) cipal, Government Higher Secondary School, g for recovery of Rs. 1,76,690 from the "2 imits that during the pendency of this petition )vered has been deposited by the petitioner. that the petitioner has alternative remedy of ;sioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur his stage, submits that he may be permitted 3 file appeal before Assistant Commissioner, r. He also seeks a direction to the said ed by the petitioner within certain timeframe. ts have no objection. dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as ippeal to the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal a’period of three weeks from the date of

¶11

mm^wPww/oté Hi²⁰⁰

¶12

ream m (Witt)

¶13

manW WWW	mmm	WW$mggfmfs$mix
	receipt of copy of this order, same four months there-from.	shall be decided by it within a further period of
	It is made clear that this C merits of the case and the authorit appeal to be filed by the petitioner ir	ourt has not expressed any opinion on the I concerned shall be free to proceed with the idependently in accordance with law.

¶14

I :rmm $§m gm.^{nmiama-v—tv'sn 40—2} [201^1—1 ,so,ooo.

Adheen Sai Benjaar and Ors. v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adheen Sai Benjaar and Ors. v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Kesara Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ku. Jubarani Mandal Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Paras Ram Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Victor Ekka Vs Pt.Ravishankar Shukla Univ.RAIPURandORS.

Joiddha Prasad Sahu Vs South Eastern Coald Field Ltd. and Ors.

Balram Chandra Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.