Disposed
Jamadar Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/5200/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH coma- OF CHHATT156ARH AT gILAsPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH coma- OF CHHATT156ARH AT gILAsPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH coma-OF CHHATT156ARH AT gILAsPUR (6.6.)
mp. (s) No. 52W /0121
PETITIONER
Jamadar' Jaiswal, Aged abouf 61 years, 5/0 Srih Bodar‘ Jaiswal, Head Masfer, Government Primary S chool Mohdu, Block Kofa , Disff. Bilaspur (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS :
Stafe of ChhaHisgarh Through Secrefur‘y,
School Education Deporfmenf D.K.S. Bhowan, Raipur (6.6.) The Direcfo‘r Public Ins‘rr-uc’rions Ralurp (6.6.)
Dis‘rr‘ic’r Educafion o fficer Bilaspur, Dis‘r‘r. Bilaspur (C.6.)
Jon?i D irecl‘or, Treasury, occoun’rs, pension, Bi laspur' (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE coNsTITUTION OF INDIA
HEGH CGEURT $F EHHA$TIS€§ARE AT EELASLPUR $B : HGK’BLE MR. &USTECE FRfEL‘INKER BEWAKER Kata;$30.5230mm§ FETE’I‘! $33§ER ukunmlar Jaj$wai
VEISES
RES?9NDENT$ Sfate of (1G. 3x, {lttham
Shri KS. Pawar; counsci for this ptttiziener. Shyi Pravccrx Dag) DV. G. A. for mt: Stats.
WRIT PETETIQN UNDER ARTECLE 2‘26 ()F TEEE CQHSTKTUTiaw OF EMBEA
QWER
§O$.O9.2€§11}
’
5
Giisvancr: Gf tbs patitiancr in the pmsem" y¢:1:iti6n is than: thi‘. petitimmrwasappointsiiaSDeputyTeachar 0:1 a fixet‘; yay saam (3f R$. 106-150 fer a pmisd 01‘ mo yaars mid affm‘ comp‘ksiian 0f pm’aation,hewas grantadmgular payscaieofRs.1&9—390. Ca13t€n§ion of rim cmmwE m1 mi: gyafitiener F that ha i3 EntitEad fm‘ mgular pay $caia whh ei‘fac? from me aiam of initial appaim‘métm. arid his Gasa is squardv covm‘fid with Immfimr 0f dacisiorm pa$S€c¥ by” this {201121. aim aisa 1:136 jucigmam randemd by th§ Ml). 3mm AdministxatiV€ Tribunal, Jabeipxxr 1h GA. Na. 2'?45f$’9 mwihukcmg Yaeiu & 5$ Wham Vs. $t‘ate afMZR 8.5 athears) what: in it has bag-.11 heki mat Simiiariy placad teachem cur entiikd far regmar pav scale £r0m the giatf: 9f their mitial aapeintment. Ii is not diapmxid by both ms: parties that the ma ttcr was takPn 11;) by theWat: t0 mi: Afmx Court but {hg apuaa‘! was alsc; (iimaaismd ky the. Apax Courft apha’k‘ihug this diicismzi ofme Tribunal t0 the. eftut that the .‘agchwsjAsSistaHt Taachm's me muitlad for mgular pay scale fmm {ha dam of théif initjai appomtmam.
m viaw 0f tha above submission ma(},e ey the cmmeei fey the paxfiesufhe Eneiition 1e diepoeed of m the eame ielme ie. me Eieijtienefis greetedeberty 1.tomakearepresenmtien,ifs0aavissed, it} ‘ \
the light of the aforesaid iudgmantsmd the. Circular damd5.12(111 {AmmxumP]‘2}andintum,thecanctmtadmspendentii;ziirecisdto censider thair cast: on its own maxim mad iii iis pémpectiva Xf the patitioner stzmcis on the samu‘: foomg: as perayder pawmiby Line 'E‘Iibumal State A(£minis#rativa in Madhukam Yadzi (gupra) and subsaquexxtly comirmsd by the: Sugremc (butt: in $p€cia1 Laaw; Peki’fion (CIVE} NG. 6892(93 by ordgrdated 03.01.95,. th€’petidanm‘ 'to méy ba amitiad sams rt‘liaf aqcordingiy.
It is axpected from 1136‘ Sfate aufheritks it) mags suitablc011%}? aftsr dua scmtiuy ofmsfacts.
ix is matk dear that tMs {:ourt“(133 :30: Expresmiél anyapmivn 0}} the merits of €36 casaandthe:autharityconCrimer’kwauldbeat Ii'bsrty to dacide themprasentationsm‘ctiyinaccoréaucawithlaw.
SdlPritinkerDiwakar Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jamadar Jaiswal
State of Chhattisgarh
Shri Ptinker Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court