A writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India was treated as dismissed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur for non-compliance with a peremptory court order dated 06/09/2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^.
^
^"
r^ ^
c'r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION No. /^ 7^ 2001
1.
PETITIONERS
^^s^'«' M^2:^^
r:-..fc%^ €^~
:^-
'^^'
^:SS^i
3.
Diwaker Singh^ S/o Rameshwar Prasad Bharadwaj, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Jarve, Teh. & Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
^J
^
^
-^
>i°""
r-:.s^
Deputy Director, Lok Shiksharan Shiksha, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
\c
-2-
xt
"^.
^
^^^^w^"ty^^^
^;%^
All respondent No. 4 to 12 are Shiksha Karmi, Grade III, posted at janpad Panchayat Balouda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
^0^~ ^os^ ^ndq^•^^ (JU AA^J ijt^i^^ ..^^. --.--.-.---.-------—-'—
i
II^l
^^ ^
^l§1 ^ ^ ^> ^> 4
tL
83
^tl^Tfei^^P
Fr -,^'(^^ ^ .^&' ^ c^ r 91
?iU?al^q ; /- ^
:i:
l^^^^i a
>l F ^
.1
^ ''•fttl^F' ^
il ^ ^
" f 1
'? -^ ttta ^ pl^
F-
? iP
nn !o 31
ta:^^e Q 1
II
3?1
1j
23 II t
jllKiR;il Bi
'7^ ^l^l^t^, 0i11^^<o,f^IRT3T
| ^fl^'?5f^('^{ | f33^ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ' 3n^7^Tf?^N? ^m^TWi^^ |
^l^i^l^T^TO^f^ 1= ^i '?f^R'yI -^^tlww - ^K M lli^ .4111^ : H |
||
| 1:1 | Vs 1ai 19/10/2011 This case is treated as |
||
| Sd/- A.R.(J) Bl ^M :if |
|||
| S.O.(Writ) . <br>"•^ ^:BI;fi:l :filll |
1
III
^W^ ^h? lg$[<TOr^, <l^Wlk-—FS/l40—2/2011—1,50,000.
Diwaker Singh
Rangilal
Bhasker Singh
State of Chhattisgarh
Vicentia Ratre
Virendra Kumar Kashyap
A.R. (J)
S.O. (Writ)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
