Permit became infructuous due to expiry of period for which it was sought.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
"^;.
U i %^^m ^e^--^
^x
^^
HIGH COURT OF THE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 5614 OF 2010
PETSTJONER
Santosh Kumar Yadu, aged abput 39 years, S/o- Puniram Yadu, R/oWard No.6, Chuchurungpur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
Vs.
RESPONDENT
Regional Transport Authorlty, Raipur (C.G.)
WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Appearance:
Mr. Arnan Kesharwani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Shailendra Bajpai, Advocate for the petitibner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel jawyer for the respondent.
ORALORDER
(07.01.2011)
SUNILKUMARSINHA.J.
Heard.
Mr. Arnan Kesharwani, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to Withdraw this writ petition on the ground that the period for which the permit was sought, has already expired and the petition has now become infructuous.
Permission granted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn havjng become infructuous. -_
-_
Sd/Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge
Santosh Kumar Yadu
Regional Transport Authority, Raipur
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
