The High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with liberty to avail statutory remedy. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail statutory remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5U
HIGH COURT OF THE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 72900F 2010
PETITIONER Ajit Singh Dhadiwal aged 67 years S/o Late Shri Sadhu Singh Dhadiwa! R/o Street no.8, Qr. No. 3 ~ B, Sector No.1, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)
Vs.
RE§P9NDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Magistrate, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Superintendent of Poiice District Durg (C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional Magistrate District Durg (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE228/227OFTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Appearance:
Mr. Anurag Jha, Advocateforthe petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel LawyerfortheState.
ORAL ORDER
(06.01.2011) ‘1 SUNILKUMARSINHA-J —-———-———-—/#,—4 I. Heard.
Mr. Anurag Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permissiontowithdrawthiswritpetitionwith liberty to availstatutory remedy available tothe petitioner.
Permission granted.
Accordingly, the writ petitionisdisposedofaswithdrawnwiththe aforesaid tiberty grantedinfavourofthe p‘etitioner.
/ sw-
SunnKumar 5mm Judge
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajit Singh Dhadiwal
State of Chhattisgarh
District Magistrate, District Durg
Superintendent of Police, District Durg
Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Durg
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
