The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file another. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted permission and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file another petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTI$GARH=BIAPU LSR WP‘W). N0.1i}612011
pETITlONER
Responoeme
WRIT PETlTlGNUNDERARTICLE22$OFTHE CON$TlTHTlONOFiNBiA
Aegearanee:
otter. oRoER
(10.91.2(311)
SUNtL KUMARSINHA.J .
Heard
2
W.P.(C}. N0.106i2{)11
@
Leamed counsel for the petitioner seek$ permission to withdraw this petition with iiberty to fiie another petitienwithmore grounds,factsanddocumente. Permission granted. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with theaforesaid iiberty granted in favour of the petiioner.t I 'M‘ , Sci/j i SunilKumarSinha \ x Judge i ‘/ » WWW
M/s. Essar Steel Chhattisgarh Limited
State of Chhattisgarh
National Mineral Development Corporation Limited
Union of India
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
