On appeal by the minor parents of a deceased 7-year-old child, the court considered enhancing Motor交通事故 compensation awarded at Rs. 7,00,000. Relying on precedents, the court held no enhancement was warranted and dismissed the appeal.
Appeal for enhancement of compensation dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
111@HG@UfETW
^mu^niR
GOIIASMs
HOWB SM^mil^^
Mise.JtoBeal^N^4«^^a>ee^^^^^^^^
Claimants
1 ^nlram N^iact^ i^d ^^iA 4©years, S^CboilulNlsN^" r
2 St^^w^ BIA Nirt^ l^A^^i^^ yeai^\ ^ri8e^^l^ ;
Both RA> Vlltag®"-B@Nd, Fk© eeSfettten - Rnge^war (RW^, Dtefric^ Raipur (C^r
VE^US
^a
ResDondente Non-dajiiFiiis
Ahmed Khsui, fsril NhiR, W6 <ly|^Wl;':' • .tllli,:. }!S^^Wa^:.PiW^/^ ^Wtton ^^^^^^ ^,.^WiM» Na^s®%mn'Kt(<|G| of Jeep ^^^^^^^^^ ^ priver ^felEai<»»No.©©G(i©^E^
Pandlt Kumar ®enyl,Rito Main Bagbahara, Piolfee^8tett<»»—1 QistFict- Nalwsarpitnd (G<^ (CNffiw of Jeep Wt^i? ^NU^ registrsrttoff No.WC^^
The New- to^ Nsuim^ @oro| nFiy Utr^d, throygh piwis^rt (pc^ ©l^isKanal Nar^^r, ^A 8tN?t, Ba|rau1^ Marfe^;, Raipyr, TelsW ii ©istelet~ Ralpur <©<^(Insyrer o1 <teep Wriote^bearing ^egistrstoN& <S<S 06^A-202^
MiseeUanfis»usfcADB»rfund®K^®<^on<iy8^if
Pr^ent : Shn ShN@A F^BI^ a^^ . ,;-<xNi^i^^^:N%»i?^-:.^'4.:. .?.11 ^ ^ 'rNone fer r^pCTXt®^N@^ 1 wid t.
••U i
'^"
•&-
^Klli^ ;@IW8t^NitB|lTl^|G^^ Anand ©upta,c^yrt fi»Ns|lt^
^y: •'^•^^•^.;;;-!';"-:^';p-;:;;^-.^^:S:?S> ^•^^^
is^iw^mt^
The folt®Min@ Qi'der c^ t^ ©oyrt w»s passect Is^
R^eev duptey^rtl.
The untoitororte pawents ctf de^ased l)©y*totetee^^Ni^^T agetf about 7 yea are the appeUa^li^o^ en^ancen^ <^^ ccwnpe^^ a^apleil toy the 1<l ^^|RS^ | l^okwAe^eteE^^lato^T^^ vNe|waRlda^tm.€®.2(M16,^^e^
^ As agarfnst^ie <^ip@(wata"i ©fRs.it2t^,@©^etedme^t^ the appeUafrtstelaimantSt unfortoffiate parerte @f cte©^s®^b@y l^ilcteep Nlshgd, by flBng a eteto p^tiOR ipder ^c^iQR t^^^f ) the Netor ^iiele& J^t, fer Ns death ^ ll^ ITO^ aeddrt en^^ - 01.02.2006, th& TNbunal «warded a totat sura eff Rs^S»©^"fl®^~
c<^pen^(U@n alcingNft inler^^^^^p^ oftl^Wn^©ftlw€latopeUUonW ie4^of^^
^ Shrt Shl^nda Pimclya s^ ^ri Tiu^ @a^^ia^^|^^ wunselfor theappeBaCTte^
erred In awaFdh^ tow eomper®aN<m^^^^^^ j appellar^ son NuNeep NNwd ^i®aNiMI^ ste^^ twight fyten®gmd tie would have esrtencted grsBat Nippeirt ^ ^ pswente SR thelr old age.
Anand Qupta, teaCTied e^tfrasel IEIF re^enetent h^ tw%N«yW^i ^ i
a^l^Si^^iML....^
Insui-anee Gompar^ Umited, ©nUNT other ftand ^ytemlttect tiat the ccptpenss^n of Rs^,00©^asvarded t^^^^^t^^
proper compensatton in the facte su^ c^umstanc^ <rf th»4 8swi^
yearsin eeaseofOrlentallnsia»anceGo.Ltd.¥tfSyedtei'ahini and ottiers reported in 2@W ^ T«A.©.^^^^^^(S.©^observed to
paFas9&t&:
MQ. This G©yrtin LateWadNwa whtleeompytti^ compensaitton made distinctlon be^yeen »e
ctece^^ childreRfsUir^wlU^thea^^pup@(^ 5 to 10 yeam and a@e gffoyp of IQlo tS yeam. 10. In Gase^«?yyoun^^hildren of teiwlw age, bi view of uiweEtaiiiiU^ about, netther thelr incomesAihe ttme(yfdea8iftorttepE®pecteoy the future incpease In their tnooine n@r ©hancet of advancement of thetr career are ^pateite <^ proper ctetermlnation on estimatec^ baais. The reason is that at such an earty a@e, th® uncertalnties in regard to theh' aeadeinte pursuits^aehievementsto oar^ <ndttwrealteBr advancemerrt In life; are so many ttiat netNi^ can tee assymed wi a^Rable (^'tain^.Therefore. netther is ttie Ineome @^ ttw - dee^aseGt ©Nld eapaNe ^^^ a^^ ^w^^
estimsrtedb^tetiortettie^flnaiielaAteissayiwedt by the parent& a^able ^ Rnathematteat* computertlon."
-^..
4
The Apex Court in the <»seof Orlentel Inswance Co. LN. V. Syed Ibrahim and others (supra), held that the Gompensatien of Rs.51,500/- was just and proper compensation for ttie death ®fa chiklaged about seven years.
Sd/-
Sd/R.N. Chandrakar Judge
ChiefJustice
subbu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compensation of Rs. 7,00,000/- awarded for the death of a 7-year-old child warrants enhancement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Syed Ibrahim and othersReferred¶44
Minor Parents of Deceased Kuldeep Nishad
Oriental Insurance Company Limited
R.N. Chandrakar
Chief Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
