The appeal filed by M/s Rajat Enterprises through a partnership firm was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite the matter being called twice.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR
M.A. N0. 3 /2011 APPELLANT : M/s Rajat Enterprises Partner Company through Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumar Golchha S/o .>-" Late Kanwar lal Ji Golchha, R/o ..-',.'-1 ,<lf" Naveen Bajar Raipur,Tah 85 Distt ^^s&^'"'^-^ RaipurfC.G.) y<s0n.---^dY " ev VERSUS RESPONDENTS; 1) Pitambar S/o Shri ./ Goverdhan Manjhi R/o Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) 2) AV Murli Ram S/o Domuram Rawat, > / Occupation Truck Driver, R/o Village and Post Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.,5/f The United India Insurance ^ Company /'' ' Limited, City Branch Office No.2, Raipur Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Kutcheri Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) -S• ... f" . • -' MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
:rc"
•^&s, ^."%
^^*
if S .f.c'^Sk <S
i.1
g
?,,ss^"*u i-tilsM
M/s Rajat Enterprises Partner Cor
Pitambar and others.
APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIViL PROCEDURE
[SinaEe Bench: Hon'bEe Shi
•ressnt : None for the appeliant.
(Passed on 1 day of March,2011]
The matter is called twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representafion is made on behalf of the sppsISant. The appellant may not be interested in prosecuting the matfer.
Su/N.K.Agaw/a! Judne
K>/r
_^
M/s Rajat Enterprises Partner Company through Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumar Golchha
Pitambar S/o Shri Goverdhan Manjhi
AV Murli Ram S/o Domuram Rawat
The United India Insurance Company Limited
S.N.K. Agarwal, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
