The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order for default because the appellant failed to appear or submit representation on two summon dates.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution on both summon dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
•Ql "i,s"'s-;lia Rar'Rh VEsi' ^SS^'^Si'^ fa^-.«il'e ^*-^1-"
M.A. N0. /2011 APPELLANT : M/s Rajat Enterprises Partner Company through Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumar Golchha S/o ^.' 3WV Late Kanwar lal Ji Golchha, R/o TMaveen Bajar Raipur, Tah & Distt V<e9er ^---:'0;:"'1 ^-"^'°' Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1) Kamal Nagesh S/o Shri
Kamal Nagesh S/o Shri Chandan Nagesh R/o Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.). Murli Rara S/o Domuram Rawat, Occupation Truck Driver, R/o Village and Post Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.). The United India Insurance Cpmpany Limited, City Braneh Office No.2, Raipur Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Kutcheri Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.)
2)
MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
V-
Being aggrieved by fhe order dated 27/11/2010 passed by ' t"~—" • . the court of 14th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
E^..
IGI
Rajat Enterpriss Partner Company
Kamal Nagesh and others. APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
•<•.
fSjnale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaanwa!. J.1
esent : Noneforthe appellsnt.
o sssed on 1 day of March, 14-!t
The matter is caiied tvvice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellsnt. The appellant may not be interested in prosecuting the rnatter.
Kr
.^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit appearance or represent winding up appeal wanted prosecution.
M/s Rajat Enterprises Partner Company
Kamal Nagesh
Murli Rara
The United India Insurance Company Limited
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
