Disposed

R.R. Dubey v. C.G. State Power Holding Comp. and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Oct 2010WPS/5927/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court permitted the petitioner to make proper representation to the competent authority within three weeks before the court decides the grievance regarding unremitted retirement benefits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to make representation within three weeks; matter set to be decided by speaking order thereafter.

R.R. Dubey Vs C.G. State Power Holding… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR BILASPUR (C.G.)

¶2

Filer Writ Petition No . LS) /20’10ts§

¶3

¶4

PETITIONER

¶5

Shri R.R.Dubey S/o Late Shri R.Dubey, aged about 65 years, Occupation— Retired i ChiefEngineer (CC) C.S.E.B., R/o- MIG-45, Katanga Colony, Cantt., Jabalpur (M.P.)

¶6

Versus

¶7

RESPONDENTS

¶8

Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman

¶9

Dangania, Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

The Additional Secretary, Chhattisgar‘hState Electricity Board, Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

The C.M.D. Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Dangania, Raipur (C.G.) The Executive Director $inance), Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Dangania, Raipur (C.G.) The General Manager (HR),

¶12

Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Dangania, Raipur (C.G.) The Manager Accounts (Distribution), Chhattisgarh State Power Holding

¶13

Company Ltd. Dangania, Raipur (C.G.) 3

¶14

¶15

WRIT^{PETITIONUNDERARTICLE226/gOFTHE} ONSTITUTION^OFINDIA C_/

¶16

	m2 (s) swamWen(Wu o mm 7	wm/wlo “i200 ) Wmwm
	WWW?!	*Wm
	SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pritinke 8-10-2010 Mr. Amit Shukla, counse! ^fo Mr. Abhishek Sinha, coun copy.	r ^Diwaker ^’thepetitioner. sel for the respondents, on advance
	Heard. Grievance of the petitioner Engineer (CE), Chhattisgarh ^Stat date certain retriai benefits i.e allowance, revised pay scale fr pension ^{have not been done, des} respondents on several oc representations. Learned counsel for the r may make a detailed representa date of receipt of copy of this decide the same by speaking ord The petitioner is permitted ^t proper ^{representation before resp} date of receiptof copy of ^{this or} competent authority to decide t speaking order as expeditious months from the date of receipt of c h !	s that he retired from the post ^{of Chief} Electricity Board on 31-1 2-2005, ^{but tii} fuii amount of gratuity, stagnation m 1.12.2005 and settlement of fina ite the fact that he has approached ^the onwby making oral and written spondents submits that the petitioner on afresh within three weeks from ^the der and in turn, the respondents will rwithin further three months. withdraw this petition ^{with liberty to file} ndent No.3 within three weeks ^{from the} er and in turn, it is expected from the representation of the petitioner ^{by a} as possible preferably within three ^{the said representation.} JWJsfw/I i r ,W
-e tidtwgs‘rir	Ordered accordingly. mr, ^{{mfzmta-<-r’s"i47*z/2oi0 «—1,oo,ooo.} ¥	Sd/— Pritinker ^Diwaker Judge

R.R. Dubey v. C.G. State Power Holding Comp. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.R. Dubey v. C.G. State Power Holding Comp. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Divisional Manager C.G. Inf.Dev.Cor. Vs Ramswaroop Gupta and Anr.

Vijay Kumar Das Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Rajendra Prasad Sahu Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.and Ors.

Sushila Soma Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Dilip Kumar Chaturvedi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sanu Ekka Vs State of C.G. and Ors.