This judgment is considered unreadable due to excessive OCR noise. A petition was dismissed by directing the petitioner to make a fresh representation for ad-hoc commission within one month.
To make a fresh representation before the respondent within one month and File an appeal within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
©
c^-^
IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
W.P.S.No. ^_£) /10
Latel PrasadYadaw,S/o Jagdish Prasad Ysdaw, aged about 42 years, Peon, Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar,
y^y VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
State ofChhattisgarh, ThrougU Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.)
^' -
WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITCTION OF ENDIA
visSyX
^ass K'SS •l :S:
WSM
•^'.'^v lffi[ tiit1:!
•S 11 m
l^^^^s^i^;^^^^
y^€^:'&:^e^:^y^'ssss%s>l
'HS!BStiE»mssRi!Sp'isa i0 Smai&
^tW fS'StXSSt 3WSS'sec^SiRSS'WSSS^^
.-i.i']:i:'
|wai';imBwGigsi'?»9^2G ^.':^^::.^^
Siffi.' M%;®il ®[asad^^Yatiay".:;;? ::: '-'.':'1 • .:'v yiVeisSisiK&S^. '•'•''-'-
RBsnaNBBa'ra
•SSgigS^^'efES^^KSWxc^
ysiitR^g^essu^fsv^BS^ssssgKSSSssf^MsEs^eiSti's^i^ssM .i-^-s-y^.fiSK' ;-^;£:: ^S£vt S%g)8Sga(iBtiA(,gm:--::'?¥E^;s:;;'.:::r^B3?:M^^^^^ ii.s^
:!GKB®Br
a:.:?^;3KJsiS^^BKBfiHiM^BjMI&lffi^^Rrese:iit:'mBffHK;ls^N^^ ^:t'^:^'^^^^;l;^@S^^S^^^^i^^^^^S^S^iS^^'?ft?^^;;^^^i'^^^^'^tS^^^^I^^;®i^S^^li%^^^^^lljN^S^^^^^^^ :^:'? i;: ^.;i"'^:. r' isiS'apsEtaoiBal': BBiMWMSW8SaWIS118 j^8®l^ ®DBISJBSe< ^:;BEiwlN:^ tei:H:itlG<$^3G:w;;f^?beiiii^ ®81:Bu^M|Sg|s^B|^ eEsaei^il^?tti^.;Q<! eriuncD;t?F[ffi:«E:j^lttje' 'i^t.ii&^^ |g|i'ia|Ea|^|cBgeaB^B^^g|B|;ffiej^me^iifijs^|ajoSi l^i^^S2K '.A'GCO|'8|i^::^|Bi^l^^^%2^Bl^l^^l8?'3^1i^^N^^s^;%:a©"B~3l8B5^:i8S®4iJsS:''l';5^%® fa^ ':GemnEiaweSi:^^s^^s^S^'S^y>eSSoB^.:sSSrs^aS^-^ ^axseff:^ .,persoas,.';;WHtglRetEyD|^g'B|G®egffliiE^ ^iiltimat^;affigri^^ffi^i®|i|»xijapj^|]3^1©^^ : l^ K^ ;|^;(3<?miaiSSi^i.i|w^|^ram|e®^^EKem*-^ '' •J,;.; .' , '^V
:2.,^Y;:E2oua^:':^^'ffiiei:^peEHj|oit^|au8|^^ wbuIld;F1t^.s^i||^;j:ffii^tfHis|sjt^&l||^p^ vi'ifbidBBretBiMlpeBiBi^?aESa|cii|te®S@UI^ . ^:';'3K@E^^;';!SSgB'%B®SiSH}gg^%£:3^ :N0.1: ^ideNaiB^itUej^oB^^ (AmiexuBe:P^5)^dat^;lI.^80^0.'v ;:,'':: :^..'.;:1::,:'''-:':''/';'''1:::^
:N0.1: ^ideNaiB^itUej^oB^^
tffiiiiiiiii.iiii'if^ii
'^^^ss&^sss. -tl^^lJ^K. l':::;:[?;:<5%^ i?^L'''^••^i^'^K'f'-
•!B:: :t^:'
w v
the petitioner aad similariy placed persoas fer grant aF6<K.E^i Conunission. is already under coasjderatibn aBd let itie petitioner niake a fi-esh reprcsentation aad tfae same WQiild be deCided ia; aecordaace -with law.
Sd/— pritinkerDiwakar Judge
II
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to ad-hoc officer commission for rejoining the service.
Whether the petitioner should make a fresh representation before grant of commission.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Latel Prasad Yadaw
State of Chhattisgarh
Director, Higher Education
Shashtri Shikshan Samiti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
