Yashwant Kumar Bahirat v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
tate 3ammistratwe Tribunal Ma&hya §rades…
tate 3ammistratwe Tribunal Ma&hya §rades…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Befme the Hm'ble tate 3ammistratwe Tribunal Ma&hya §rades b Ralpur Bench at Raipur M P‘
in the mattet c£ D.A.No¢:
Ee‘cwee n
¥a5hwantKama: Bahirat 39 yeam, sun iif 3hri‘ Ananf: Rat) Ramahandr a Bahirat; “L ibrariem' , G0vt.Fuljha2: Mahavidyalaya,
VergES
Ii ighex: néucamm, Vallabn Bhawan Bhcpal MaPa
AFFLICA 1m U/s. ;9 OF Am’IIVIaTRATW" TRLBUNAL $312
mm,m‘m
| $£§ : HQm’aaa $§m Manimira mahaw |
$hr§va§tava, ‘L |
|---|---|
| ‘3; Iif‘lgmQ |
|
| When the matter was callec¥ |
for hearing, Hone appeared far the |
| pet‘rtianer/s and the matter waS passg appears for the pet'rtioner/s, Shrr41¢ -1}i’;‘$}—~——3‘-"-’ o “wwxt.5”‘ ——————f Earlier SPC. was issued to th Since no one appears for th made on his/their behaif‘ the petition |
d over Ewen in the secend round, nene fw‘ re State. e petitioner/s. e petitioner/s and no representation is e diemissed fer want of prosecution. |
| e Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge |
Vaishwant Kama Bahirat
State of Madhya Pradesh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court