Narendra Kumar Shrivastava v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
STfiTE SDMIN1 STRST I VE .TRIBUNflL RfiIPUR…
STfiTE SDMIN1 STRST I VE .TRIBUNflL RfiIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
iN,THE M,P, STfiTE SDMIN1 STRST I VE .TRIBUNflL RfiIPUR BENCH
l?a
.A. N0. OF 199; £<jY?<^^S-(((sy
| Mare S/'o |
ndra Kuma!- Shrivastava, Late S.N.Shrivastava, |
|
|---|---|---|
| flged |
about 4S yrs. |
|
| Vari Offi F'.L. Pin Dist |
shtha Lefehapal, ce of the Cominandant, Homes, Mana Cainp, Raipur 4<?g 015 rict. Raipur M.P. |
ftPPLICANT |
| VERSUS | ||
| State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Punarvas Vibhag, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhooal ! |
||
| 'p | The Punarvas ayukta, Vindhyachal Bhavan, |
|
| 3. | The Collector, District Callectorats, Raipur M.P. — 493 OOt |
|
| 4. | The Comiriandant, P.L. Hon-ies, Mana Camp, Raipui- M.P. — 49S 015 |
|
| 5. | Shri Khokhan Chandra Saha Accountant/fisstt. Grade II <U.D.C.)/ (^^•^@'j-^ 3^ Ass'fct Of-Eice oi the Coinmandant, P«L»Ho(T!eSp Mcsna Camp p Raipur M.P. - 49S 015 |
NON-APPLICPiNTS |
| APPL JBIBU |
ICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE. NftLS ftCT, 1985 |
____ftDMJNISrBeTI:"E |
| DETAII OE fiPPLICftTiaN |
||
| 1. | Earticulars ot the appiicsnt ; |
|
| fis stated in the Cause Titls above |
||
| c'a)-.tAcyla?-s_j3f__the_8ssRonde^^^ | ||
| fts stated in the Cause Title above |
^.g ^nqRTO, •STilwre.'fwwp
•WRn%WSi7' Q^S-H'"^./ss~~
3^51^1
SIRRI'reiiw^rftfi +i<)I<'t<il-i im?S •? iyS <fa^i< i; 3i15git sn^;
SB : Hon'ble Shrf Manmdra Mphan Shrivastava, J.
^-^
When the matter was calted for hearing, none appeared fcr the petitioner/sandthematterwas pass^d over. E'/en in the second round, none appears for the petitioner/s. &(f^ Shri 3y^.&wvtJQ^Kf^ the State. Eariier S.P.C. was issuecf tothfee petitioner/s. Since no one appeare for th^ petitioner/s and no representation is made on his/their behalf, the petitfon s dismissed for want of proseoution.
Sd/—
Manindr.M.hanShrivastava Judge
fT^^ '^J-T^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition can be decided in absence of the petitioner.
Mare S/o Sondra Kuma!- Shrivastava
State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Punarvas Vibhag
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court