Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to an IA application by the appellant, who had reached a compromise with the respondents.
IA No. 03 allowed; second appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
•^
HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
S.A. No.80/2010
APPELLANT 1. Amar Nath Gupta, aged about 54 Defendaat S/o late Shri G^'anand years, Gupta, R/o Sewakunj Raigarh, TahsU & Disti-ict Raigarh (C.O.). VERSUS
RESPONDENTS Natwar Lal Gupta, aged about 39 Plaintifls years, S/o Late Bhagrathi Gupta, R/o Bhawan Shiv Trading Company, Chhattamuda Raigarh, TahsU & District Raigarh (C.G.) Respondents/ Mohaalal Gupta, aged about 47 years, S/o late Shn Gajanand Gupta.
Respondents/
Sajan Kumar Gupta, aged about 47 years, S/o late Shri Gajanand Gupta.
Both are R/o Sewakunj Raigarh, TahsU & District Raigarh (C.G.).
SECOND APPBAL U/S 100 OF THB CIVIL PROCBDURE CODB.
(SB sHon'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.j
Present:Ms. Hameeda Siddique, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 1. None for the respondents No. 2 8s 3.
ORAL- JUDGEMENT
(Passedoa08/04/2010)
Sd/T.P. Sharma Judge
^
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Nath Gupta
Natwar Lal Gupta
Mohaalal Gupta
Sajan Kumar Gupta
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
