This is a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No advocates appeared, and Service Proceedings Copies (SPC) were not returned by the parties.
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>1
IN THE HEQH’C5UHT a? NABHV§ ?FQDESH AT 3%BALPU?.
Second Appeai Ngaiéé‘/9?.
> A ¢ELLANT u VNif;/5mt Saja Bai Aasli Sarju Hai ,
V
a? Laxman Ran, aged about 4d yeats,
Resident gr Ramkundgcmrhumih ward,)
Raipur
1 (RFC).
{ y Versus
R E SPDNDENT . V Laxman Baa, aged about 58 yaars,
Son a? Hotchand Sindhi, Resident~nf
Badhai Para, Raipur (M.P.).
S$CGND APPEAL UNDER SECTI N 1QD UF THE CQDE QF CIVIL
PRGCEDURE.
'
‘h
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the second appeal filed by the appellant.
VNif;/5mt Saja Bai Aasli Sarju Hai Lalxman Ran
V Laxman Baa
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
