Dismissed
Ram Jatan Singh v. Kishan and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCSA/373/1991
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
S.B.:‘ Ho‘n’ble Shri Justice Prash 4-3-2010…
What the court decided
AI extract
S.B.:‘ Ho‘n’ble Shri Justice Prash 4-3-2010…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.
.
.
| S.B.:‘ Ho‘n’ble Shri Justice Prash |
ant Kumar Mishra | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-3-2010 | ||
| Gopal | Ms. Sharmila Singhai, cOu Shri Utkarsh Joshi, counse Shri Sanjeev Agrawa State/respondent No.3. No one appears for respor This Court had issued S.F 2005. Learned counsel for the e sending repeated communicatio responqed and as such she plea In the circumstance, the want of prosecution. Learned counsel for the move an application for restora appellant takes interest in prosec |
nsel for the appellant. el for respondent No.1. i, Panel Lawyer for the dent Néz. l >.C. to' gboth the parties on 27-9- ppellarit submits that in spite of ins to the appellant, he has not ds no in‘structions. secondEfappeal is dismissed for l fl. appeiiaht shan be at liberty to ,ion of the second appeal if the uting the appeal. ’ l v “\r’4/ Sdl- Prashant [theW Kumar Mishra E fr\e ~ rr/(/ 'gig/I f. |
Gopal
State
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court