Nagar Palika Parisad Kota v. Bagal Paper Mill Co.Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh examined whether Section 133 of the Saran Municipality Act bars an applicant from claiming a refund of duty levied on a suit. The Court referred to various precedents to determine the jurisdiction and scope of the refund claim under the relevant statutory provisions.
What the court decided
IN mg HIGHCOURT OF MAD
AWELEAN}; : Nagar‘Palika ‘Rarishadrl‘ tKota, w TE’éi’e’mE-Ent) Bilaspur.
¢Versu§:-
IRESPONDE-NTS :-1) The BengalPaperMillCoi Ltd., w having Haad Office in NetajiSgbhash / Chand Road, Calcutta. ‘SEQTIQN r100 AyPEAL UNDER C_.P_.c.‘’IMET %WEE‘"K§§§IWEY“?§§ E decrga value Vat Rs.3200/_ on which c eur’t'fee Rs.3’70/is affixad as in tgla_;:gmer Cough
HIGH EUURT OF $§ik§ATfE$G§W K? §§L§k$WfsF§
‘1 “ingle Baagh: mm’hte $hri éummFrasharetKumak'Miahgg Swami ixppeal Maw!$81 Aweliant Nagar Fatika Pa§§$hat§, Kata Deféndani
VerStgg
aéwamjea: Tm aemgaj ?aper Mi!5a.Li‘d‘ ‘ 3%;m AK. Paadgy, mamaeé gor theapwitam.
:Wpeat gnaw $ectian ma a? mgGama9% mm:Pmwéum GRAL mmmem g94mgmm
Thiaa iudgment shag govem the digpmzat m‘ $€mrz£ ikapa? Nagal‘mm. Secam Appeal Na £39I1QQ1 and 83mm? Awaa? Na..1w1 9%. m an ihe awea‘s the p§amtlffwe$pament ”7315 f m? w mg? rafund m the ameunt a? Qstmé tiuty saileateé §1y {Jiii? ‘fhe appeikantiwlummpalvaunmlFar me Kg evant pg am $u§t$ w?“ demew by {he mat 53mm, The fiat appaals mefemd by h *{Mcmew’r appelkamiw‘umsmak Gammaweye(1mmed {if by mmman ané dem'ee which aw impugrged mthewéhma wpeatsg.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 133 of the Saran Municipality Act is a restriction affecting the petitioner-padidarar's right to claim the unreserved portion of a recovery made under that Act.
Whether the scheme of Section 133(2) prohibits any person from claiming the unreserved portion of the amount recovered.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aweliant Nagar Panhaksahari
- respondent
The Bengal Paper Mills Ltd.
Coram
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/9/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court