Istiaq Hussain v. Itayat Hussain
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was dismissed in the absence of appearance by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
IN TH.E HIGH COURTx OF MAT zoé SECO ND RAPPE L NC . ‘ APLEANEET : Iqstia Hu. Ksain sango‘wahidf3Hus Defendan:t age d abou 6 2 years, R¢tire d _ \ Rallwav§ ploee.y ro/ nare Manohar‘ Tlie,aks Tuna, Bpllasur, Tha Bi aspu r. V s. yf/ RSNQENEPGTEPGT : Iaatt§ Hus Plaintiff : a gde aofjbt 52 y,ears ggpVcuation— V' w‘ Riai lffwa B r iver, ridétesh o f Juna Blapiéu r: a.1’“,rh and BilpaSur, M.P.
RSNQENEPGTEPGT : Plaintiff :
MEMO .Q F‘ SCEQND APEALP UNI) ? R sacwoIN 100ETE/0'’H CODE C”?‘ ILVI ‘RCEBUREPQ A J’T‘AINS ”PE?Ix JUI‘C‘MEB 3&ND‘DCR E J ATE“ 1 6 2 19‘9 ‘ SECOND MDIQK$ITL JUD F. 2W ‘\ r; \ W JUDGE BAsU‘IIzpR IN CIvIL A ! LDPF‘AL N03 8—Q 3‘ / ‘ ‘REVR ESJ‘NG THE: mGMENT A m J nmECREFp En13'.‘7f1.931 ,zas/aEmB-YP FIFHT Iv-IL Jim:’YE, chm-S3 I I BIsmPU. a4
W95
mm (W)
mmf‘awia; Evmmwfwwm
WWW
iimmm amimm
5.8. Han’bie Shri Justice Prasmnt Kuihar M§shra
11.03.2010.
None fer thevappenant.
The matte! was calked twi se and; bath me measiuns none
agpeared §m the appeuant. This Court ii; left with n9 §$her cpti§n,
but :0 dismiss the appeak far want at pro esution.
Amaréiagly, the appeak is c ismi$$éfd m want 9f pmsecutmn.
Sd/—
Prashant Kumar Mlshra
Judge
swam :HW Emma m1: a ((ura ru— FS/l 47—2/20! 0 m1 ,00,000‘
Coram
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/206/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court