Mst. Tulsi Bai and Ors. v. Sahib Ram and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
CDURT QF MADHYA PRHDESH AT 3ABALPUR Sscond…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vy
3/5
IN THE HIGH CDURT QF MADHYA PRHDESH AT 3ABALPUR .
Sscond Appaal No. 0f 1991.
‘ APPELLANT z Ké mu Da an o}\IhakEr Ram,
age 58 ye s, Caa$e P§n1ka,
pQLA INT IFF
Resldgpt of B varp§i. Tah§fl
i Sakti,\D13tr1 t Bila§Rur.
<br>Versus
Rigspnmm
’3 H 322§35Zimoi°3a3§r§2fh$gs§§ids2%§fs"
DEFENDANTS.
Distrist‘Bilaspur.
.
x.
h2. Pram son of Bho%a, agad 60 yaars,
cultlvator, resident OF Devarpal,
Tahsil Saktl, Dlstrict Bllaspur.
- Aghorl Son of Sadhram Panlka, aged 5O years, rPsldent of Gram Murkadih Tahsll Janjglr,Dlstr1ct llaspurao
SBNDEC APPEAL UNBER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROBEDHRE BUDE.
- ‘ia‘ gm” Euwggm,wigKamag : Agw amw ‘18 yaaz's‘ RIQ Egg-am, (war$amaa3h E maamm$at§$x§w~hr 1mB‘imsqawa 3 Sz§t§t¢n$§mmmm §£ lawKgma, §' ageczétgmm4&3yeam,mm? mmag%a ‘ gnawiaa§€¢w9r{,Agmwam;EmAh
- 5aegwawhwxaxarig {Mar §amam§3 ’ $$£m1 wag»mania,mmspm
5 $3
- ‘iédiw 93% 1am iaamu, aggwmywt ska waxg,
- Rasiwwe£&amg&w,?a¥$u$a§amg SEWWi6£E5 5.1asg3a 3“»
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/54/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court