A PIL filed under Section 482 CrPC alleging delay in conclusion of trial. The Court directed the Magistrate to complete the trial as per an earlier order and disposed of the petition.
Direction to Magistrate to conclude trial as per order dated 15.9.08.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ii'nc!S©y© mTHEm^H^QUKTOFJUQICAJURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
Criminal Misc. Petition No. ^H^- Of 2010
PE t iliONER:
Nikita Swarnkar D/o. Shn" Rajkumar Swarnkar aged about 29 Years, R/o. 40-A/07, Nehru Nagar ( West) Bhilai, Thana - Supefa, Tahsil and Distt.Durg(C.6.)
-VERSUS-
RESPONDENTS: 1.
2-
^<€^
}>?%:"
f> ^3,
g^
State of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate Durg, Distt.- Durg ( C.G.)
Pushpal Swarnkar S/o. Santram Swarnkar, aged about 34 Years, Through Father Santram
Swarnkar,
Santram Swarnkar S/o. Dhannu Lal Swarnkar, aged about 64 Years.
\
5mt. Kiran Swarnkar W/o. Santram Swarnkar, aged about 59 Years. - •
All are r/6. Near Panchsheel School, Mukt Nagar Padmanabhpur, Durg, Tahsil A Distt.- Durg( C.6.)
PETCTION UN&ER SECTCON 48'2 OF Cr. P.C,
^^ •IS •M^^l
Ss^
^s^-
•
.7
SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER
Cr.Ba.P.NO, 487^2010
Nikita Swarukar
versus
State of Chhatysgarh fic. Others
Shri Surul Sahu, counsel for (he petitioner. ShriVivek Sharma, P.L. forthe State.
The litoited grievaace of fhe petitioner is that despite order dated 15.9.08 (Aruiexure P/21. tlie trial has not been concluded.
It is expected froin the leained Magisti-ate to respect the order passed by fhe learaed First Additional Sessions Judge dated 15.9.08. The Court is refrainmg itself to pass any coiainent on the conduct of tlie trial Court and will siraply expect from. tlie tnal Court to coaclude fhe trial a.s directed by flie Additional Sessions J-iidge.
Cop}'- of tliis orier be sent to the concemed Magistrate aad also to the District Judge. ensumia the coiapUance of this order.
Wifh. fhe above obserwation, fhe petition stauds iSsposed
of.
Sd/Pritinker Diwaker Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial should be concluded as per the earlier order dated 15.9.08.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nikita Swarnkar
State of Chhattisgarh
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
