was Taingk ba‘rh i n Th2 river, accud/app2§§an?ssa reached fhr'ee and affer' inserfing a piece c f cio'rh m her momh, s he wa$ subjecfed To sexuai i nfargcurse by accused namely persans Berthaiomy and Prabodh. She has alsa a§§eggd mm accedu§ personsnamgiyAfmma64Mangruwereals o presen'r ’rher‘e and ‘ may were haiding her but may have m? commiHed mpg on her. Afert EnVTigg?icn,ss chm/m? was fiied against The accused personsnaaiy m Bgr’rhaiom! (S:?rab0$h undgr Sec‘ransi 361093/ and 376—6 of Thg Endian Penal Cade, In rgspect of ether a‘wo accused persens namely A‘fmme (51:. Mengru, chaiian was fiied ‘er befare the Juven‘!e CeurT, Ambigu. Hewev,er whéie framing The charge ccurT beiew has framed fhe charge ageins’r the accused persons nameiy Eerfhekmi & 9rebcdh Kumarunder Secfion 376 of fhe Indian Pena? Cede en 2,9.‘19923 and accordinygl fhey were prosecufed. 4. So as ‘g‘a hohd the accused persans gu§‘:‘y,! prosecufion has examined as many as 1Q witnesses in sappar‘? of i’rs case. Staiements of fhe accused aersans were aisa recarded under Seci‘ian 313 af fhe Code sf Criminai Pracedure in which ihey denied The charge ieveiied against fhem and Their pleaded ‘rhis, innocence and false implica‘iian in The case. Agar? from witnesses namely Victaria Tapas {DW-l) a Dr. DC, Mahadeek (DW-z)havealsabeenexaminedbythedefence in support af its case.
