Single Bench order dismissing a writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous with the consent of the State.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIG §OURTOFCHHATTISGARH ‘ BILA$PU R
WRIT PETITION NO 1635 OF 2603
PETI‘HONE‘jg
Vuay Pandey. Sam Late Raguial Pandey, aged about 45 years, R/o Kaiiash Hagar, Rajnancigaon, Dist Rajnandgaon.
Versus
RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chnanisgarn. through the Sscratary, Urban Mminisatm§va & Deveiopmeni Department. DKS Bhawan: Raipur(CG}. 2‘ The Under $ecretaw‘ Government of Chhaaisgarh, Uyban Adm§31£strat§va~ 3,: Deveiopmeni Depar'tmém, DKS Bhawan, Rainur1" ’CGMk 1
(Writ petitionunderAmme2261227oftheConsmution of mcha) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agmhom. J.
Present :— Shri Anand $hukia, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao. Go'vt. Advocate for the State. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .... .. .. .. GREER (ORAL)
(Passedon>this4‘“day0fSeptemben200$)
Learned counsel' for the peti‘tioner, an instructions. submits that with the passage of iime, this petmon me become infructubus. to which ieamed counse! appearing for the State has no objection.
Gcwri
, o o
Sdl- ’
Satish K. Agnihotri
Judge
(iii
L , ‘
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Pandey Sam Late Raju Pandey
State of Chhattisgarh
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
