Dismissed

Surendra Singh Chawla v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Sept 2009WPC/4764/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed an Article 226 writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking consideration of his caste scrutiny application. Noting a prior order directing the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee to consider the case, the court ruled that a reasonable time was required for processing, leading to the dismissal of the current petition while reiterating the directive to consider the application e

What the court decided

AI extract

Surendra Singh Chawla Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2009)

¶1

•n/i
./

¶2

H1GH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRrFPETmON^Q No. 4764 of 2009

¶3

PETmONER Surendra Singh Chawla; Aged 38 years S/o Shri Gyan " Siiigli Chawla, R/o Gyaa House, Statioii Para, Wai-d No. . 12, Mahasamund Tahsil Mahasamimd, Distt. MaliasatilUtid (Chliattis^rh) VERSUS

¶4

RESPONDENTS 1. State of CUiattisgarh TTirou^i the Sea'etary, Departoient of Genera! Adaiitusfa-ation, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Bhavan, Rwpur (C.G.)

¶5

1. The State Higli Level Caste Scn.itmy Coinmfttee Throu^i its Chainnan, D.K.8. Mantralaya Bhavan; ; Saipur (Clihattisgarii)

¶6

1. The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund 4. The Sub Division OflBcer (Revenue) Mahasamuad Distriet Maliasamund (C.G.)

¶7

1. Kamal Kumar Tamboli S/o Dhanirani Tamboli iR/o Kunnipara, Mahasamund, Disfaict Mahasaniund (C.G.)

¶8

WRTf PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF DMDIA

¶9

SB: Hon'Ue SEhri Sattsh K.AemhotriLJ.

¶10

Present: ShrilALohani, Advocatefortfiepetitionar. Shri Anin Sao, Govemment Advocate forthe State.

¶11

OROERfORAL)

¶12

(Passed on 03ro day of Septefflber, 2009)

¶13

¶14

The petitioner has approached this Court earlier in W.P.(C) No. 1105/2009 for the same reliefs as prayed for in this petition. This Conrt, on 26 February, 2009 after having considered all the aspects of fce matter, disposed ofthe matter directing the respondeirt No. 2 to considerlhe case of the petitioner as earlier as possible.

¶15

'. 2. It is nrformed by Shri Sao, leamed counsel appearmg far the State/respondents that the application was made by the petitionw on 15 May, 2009 after the order dated 26 Febraary, 2009, passed in fhe aforesaid writ petition. 'Ehus, it is expected that a reasonable time would b& requued for consideringlfae application ofthe petitioner.

¶16

In view ofthe above; the writ petition ia dismissed. How&ver, it is agam reiterated that the High Power Caste Scrutiny Coaunittee i.e. the respondent No. 2 may considerlhe application ofthe petitioner in accardance witti law, as early as possible.

¶17

rji-

¶18

Sd/-
Satish K. Agnihotri
Judge

¶19

w"a 1

Surendra Singh Chawla v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Surendra Singh Chawla v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Gidwani Vs C.G.State Industrial Development

Tarachand Mannade Vs Dharam Das Mahilaang and Ors.

Monahar Lal Rathi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Shiv Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhilai Engineering Corp.Ltd. and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Dhamdha Vipanan Sah.Samiti Mydt.and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.