Disposed

Phoolsai Yadav v. Accountant General and Others

Chhattisgarh HC21 Nov 2008WPS/6468/2008

Case brief

from the order text

‘ ... 111200 mermm mmwmm a2“mam mm‘iwm…

AI extract

Phoolsai Yadav Vs Accountant General… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2008)

@^</sup>

. .......... W §qi$ ‘ ... 111200

	snéarm(W	)
mermm a2“mam	mmwmm	mm‘iwm $Wané21
	PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 . AcCo1 Raipt 2. State Healt‘ Mant Colla Writ Petition UIA 22¢ 8.3. HON’BLE SHRI DHIREN 21.11.2008 ‘ Mrs. Hamecda Siddique	^VI227 of ^{the Constitution of India} DRA ^{MISHRA, J.} ition S) No.6468l200 t 8 i Yadav, son of Punuram ^Yadav,aged 65 years, Occupation ^{EX~Supervisor, in} i1 Department, R/o Near Jagannath le, Baikunthpur, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh Versus mtant General, State of Chhatu‘sgarh, I(CC—) of Chhattisgarh, through ~Secretary, 1 Department, D.KS. Bhawan, talaya, Raipur (CG) Etor, District Raigarh (CG) , ^{counsel for the}petitioner. a
	Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Mr. Arun Sac, Govt. Ad HeaHi.	ocate ^{for the Stats.} unsel for respondent No. ^1.
	Grievance of the pet 31‘102003 while serving as reu’ral dues werc also ^settled daim of the petitioner for pay the satisfaction ofthe petition the above settlement. Howeve of Annexure P-l dated 13.8.	tioner in brief is that he retired on Supervisor in the Health ^Department. His at the n‘me of his retirement. ^{However, the} ment of provident ^{fund was not settled to} er. He made representation ^{throughout for} r, the respondent No. 1 ^{vide memorandum} 2007, informed ^thepetitioner ^{that as}per

@w;

m §qi$

‘. . . m 200

	311wWmm '	)
matmm mmamw	mmmméa —u— 2f	WWW'§%@W a; 31% Straw
f1	iinal calculation ofhis provide of Rs.13,650/- . It is argued t calculau'on . Learned counsel for th pressing ^thispetition ^{at this s} petitioner ^{to make a fmsh rep} redressal of his grievances before the respondent No.1, w representation Within the spec' Learned counsel for the petitioner ^{mes nesh represent} 15 days mm today along wit considered and decided by the oftwo months from the date of In View ofthe above subm the instant petition is disposed nesh representation before th grievances, ^{within 15 days no} such representan'on being ma and decide the same, on its o a further period of two mo representation.	t fund account, there is negative balance at thc above iinding is based on wrong e petitioner submits that she is not e; however, she prays for libertyito the sentation before the respondent No. 1 for lating to the claims of provident fund o may be further dixected to decide the ed period. spondent No.1 submits that in case the ^{ation before the respondent No.1 within} h copy of this order, the same shall be respondent No. 1 within a further period receipt ofthe representation. ission of learned counsel for the parties, ofwith liberty to thepetitioner to file a e respondent No.1 for redressal of his today along with copy of this order. 0n e, the respondent No.1 shall consider merits, in accordance with law, within ths from the date of receipt of the Sd/- Dhirendra ^Mishra Judge