mar w (mam) met m W Wmwma mm§wm am mer ma? . '2, aimanéa Grievance of the petitioneristhatheappliedforthe postof Sub—Engineer in responsetotheadvertisementofAnnexureP—l dated 28th May 2008 isued by the oiiiee of Development Commissioner. After selec on process was over: the nameofthe petitionerfinds placeatsrialnumber15intheselectionlistof Annexure P—2. However,th name of the petitionerdoesnotflgure in the appointment orde of Annexure P-4 dated 17.9.2008, whereas the candidates, hose names appeared below in the selection list of Annex e P—2, have been appointed. The petitioner’srepresentationAnnexureP—5)againstnon—inclusionof his name in the appointm ntorderofAnnexureP-4hasnotbeen considered and decided. Learned counsel for the petitionersubmitsthathe is not pressingthispetitionat is stage; however, he maybe permitted to file a fresh represen tion before the respondent No.4 for redressal of his grievanes, who may be further directed to consider and decide there resentation withinthespecified period. On the other hand. learnedcounselfortheStatesubmits that in case the petitionerfileafreshrepresentationforredressal ‘ of his gievances beforet e respondent No.4alongwithcopyof this order, the same sh be considered and decided by the respondent No.4 withina periodoffourweeksfromtheLdateof ‘w ii‘Jr receipt of the representatin.
