The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by petitioners challenging a matter. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous, a submission not controverted by the respondents. The order stands as a dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS^Ami AT BILA8PUR
WMT PETmGN No.174^ of20(M *
•t'...""":
PETmONER : 1. Kten-bfdiara son of Late^Janteam Saha,.
' aged' about 41'yeai^. ';'""::1: •'-•-"•"'-—•*"—
2. Riykunaar Son of t-afe Jantrmn Sahu,
.aged^about-.36.yeai-s..., ^ -.t^-i;.^,1-:®1:.^''• :rjt
3. Bhola son ofLate Jiuitram Sahu, aged
about 34 years.
4. Parmeshwar Son of late Jantraai S^iu,
aged aboidl 31 years.
All resideat of village Saragaoa, Tahsil
Mimgeli Dijstriet Baaspiir (C.G.)
VER8US
RESPONDENTS : 1. Ranalauiwar, wife of BisheAar, aged
aboirt 60 yews, residert of vifiag@
Sarga<m, Tahsil Mungeli, District
BiIaspur(C.G.) <
2. StMe of CMtettis^arh, llirou^i
Colleetw, Bilasimr (G.Gr^ ^ » ;
WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 22TOF THE CCWBTmjftON OF INmA
•:l'r^8B:'Hhal'lite:S^ri:'8atlsM^'A®rifeo<i^-ft:-^
Preseirt: SlhriP.K.Tul^^^
Shn Rayyi Vewa&, AxNoc^ fer^eriisqp^Hyent Ho. 1.
Shri Rajendra Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for fhe State.
ORALORDER
(Passed on Q2na day of Seirteiriber, ^)08)
11.'
Leamed counsel apnpearing for tie petitioaaM-s salMmts 1Sxst tfiis petition
has become infl'uctuous. Leamed cowisel appearing ft^r tfie other side €o
not controvert the said submission.
\ Sd/- . ,
\ satisbK-W'00-*
Attlit
Khirendra son of Late Jantaram Sahu
Riyakunaar son of Late Jantrai Sahu
Bhola son of Late Jantrai Sahu
Parmeshwar son of Late Jantrai Sahu
Ranilawar
P.K.Tulsi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
