Tulsi Ram Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
B^ *<it<(ici^i wCTn<t<KD ^srrey Qerqif^T ^fW…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ri Bll Bll BSH^•^B^'l: ^§:-¥^; BB
•a isai
•<<i'4 iciq *iit^lq B^ *<it<(ici^i wCTn<t<KD ^srrey
Qerqif^T ^fW t48*20(tt
w^r
:
<ti?j«h<ii 1^3 'ra a q^ qe^ ^•fw fli^ R4i«0 vn W^ft. aTFIT ^Tig^ (tg: fifvtt RirflOi^ W^WIS
Q®
'?.TOl'(€"^..'!"!
: 1 yCTft'N'ld W8-T 5W aiRlR'w <('^<tii<( Rd|<us< fifvll Reiittyt 2. wpra. TFW ^raran w'Nt, ur'n? *wiq<t w^l. fiKii Rirtltiy
(WRTT PETmON UNDER AR'nCtE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA)
(SB: Hon'bteMr. SafehK. A^iSiotn.J.)
Present : Nonefbrthepetitioner. ^ ShriArun Sao.Govt Advocate for the State. ' .
Coram
Satish K. Agnihotri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/1484/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court