P.L. Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
9F CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ PetitEon £3:…
What the court decided
HiGi-i (:OHRT 9F CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR
Writ PetitEon £3: No. 2345of 206g
Peti‘tioner
PL. Pandey! Sio. Late Shri Bhuwan La! Pandey, aged about 6S years, Retdv Professar, Rm. RaviNagar,SindhiCo!any, Jarhab‘nata, Biiaspur (CG).
Versus
Resgol‘itientS
- State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department (1f Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawam Mantra¥ay3Raipur {CG}.
- Commissioner, Higher Education, Raipur (CG;
- Governing Body!Managing Cammittee, CMD CQHege, Biiaspur (CG).
- The Prindpai, DMD.PGCol§ege,Biiaspur (CG;
(WritPetrtiorrunderArtiste226 of the Constitutioncfindia.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of leave encashment as a Professor at CMD College.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.L. Pandey
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
Commissioner, Higher Education, Raipur
- respondent
Governing Body/Managing Committee, CMD College, Bilaspur
- respondent
The Principal, DMD PG College, Bilaspur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPS/2345/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court