Vinod Minz v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
CHH%TY§$GARH AT EELA$ ENE$I¢N BENCH €3€3R§Mr…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Hl@%§ COURT GF CHH%TY§$GARH AT EELA$ P ENE$I¢N BENCH
€3€3R§Mr §-EON‘BLE $HRE RAIEEVGUPTAyC.J.& H0N53iE $HRISUNEL KUMAR$INHA,J:
MQQ Naéfz‘ of EM:
@E’FlTmNER : Vinod Minz son of SM Shani Minz, aged about 2? vearsresideniofviliage Sandhar §Doiicé station and Tahsi! Ambikapur District Sarguja (Chhat%isgarh) ‘Jeysus RESPGNDEN‘m 1‘ Stats cf Chhattisgam throughSecretary Farest Departmeni D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. 2‘ The Forest Department through the Authorised and DeputyDivisionaiFOfest Officer, Forest Dtvision, South Sorguja, District Sarguja CG.
@E’FlTmNER
owuomow‘ Fog mooattco’nouOF :ruE(EDER oATEo tmoxzoot
@tesem : None for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajai, teamedGovt.Advocateforthe resoondents.
Q R 9 E R W“September;must
The renewing order of the Court was passed by Reieev Gupta, CJ.
[\tone for the oetitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Minz
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Forest Department
- respondent
Forest Department through the Authorised and Deputy Divisional Forest Officer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCC/42/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court