(3) The appellant pleaded that he was working as a driver and was earning Rs.3,000/- per raonth. On account of injuries sustained over his right leg, he suffered permanent disability to the extent of 30%. The appellant, therefore, claimed compensation on account of permanent disabiUty; medical expenditure; loss of earning during the course of treatment; loss in future eaming capacity etc. The Tribunal recorded the finding fhat the appellant was aged about 35 years and he suffered permanent disability on his leg to the extent of 30 %. The Tribunal further held that the appellant .was eaming Rs.2,500/- per month. By deducting Rs.500/- towards the personal expenses of the appellant, it was determined that the appellant used to spend Rs.2,000/- per month on his dependents. The Tribunal, thus, taking Rs.2,000/as the dependency factor applied the multiplier of 16 and the amount which the appellant could have eamed as net income in future in normal circumstances was worked out to Rs.3,84,000/-. As the permanent disability was to the extent of 30%, the Tribunal worked out 30% of the above amount as loss of future earning to the appeUant which came to Rs.1,15,200/-. Besides the above, the Tribunal also awarded Rs.10,000/- towards the medical expenses and Rs.5,000/- towards pain and suffering. The Tribunal, thus,
