Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh one, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^OR'??'-S? ^ :Mfy Wuff
-^ -0 €-•-'i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR o W.P.fS)No. ///'/2007
Petitioner ^ Kalicharan Suryawanshi, S/o
\s}f''^:-' Makhanlalabout 43 years,Suryawanshi,R/o Birkona,Aged
Tahsil Sc District - Bilaspur (C.G.)
^iC^-
'T^,'y
k®-" ;.
VERSUS
Respondents i) State of Chhatrisgarh - Through
the Secretaiy, Water Resources
Department, D.K.S. Bhavan,
Raipur (C.G.)
2) The Chief Engineer, Water
^ ^ Resources Department, Hasdeo
.^y~ ^"^ Kachhar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
3) The Executive Engineer, Water
^Ay
Resources Department, Kharang,
S^.K^
^
Bilaspur (C.G.)
^
WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH: BILASPUR
Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J.
W. P. fS) No. 779 of 2007
Petitioner : Kaiichcnm Suryawanshi
Versus
Respondents State of Chhattisgarf) and ottiers
Mr. P. &iwakar, Senior lAdvocate with Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Stat^/
respondents.
ORDER
(Passed on 9th Day of February, 2007)
-rfie 1. Leamed counsel appearing for seeks petitioner permission of this Court to withdraw •this petition witii
liberty to file a fresh petition as and when cause of action
arises. It is ordered oiccordingly.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as wjthdrawn with
T+ie above stated iiberty. No order as to costs.
Subhash
Satisb K. Agni.hotn Judge
Kalicharan Suryawanshi
State of Chhattisgarh
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
