^ -j>' Wh. t^y IN3TE®@G®;G^SJrT}0l^t^^ 0@…
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ft-U"-"^'l/ -</^-^
Wh.
t^y
IN 3TE®@G®;G^SJrT}0l^t^^ 0@ GHEM'I'TISSARH
^•IAT''Bffi^SECER';'':;:','^
M.C.ElMo.! -2005-^
APPLICANJ' € NAS^KI-IA^, .,.,.^
S^o.LA^BAgHIR]^
.:'A'^a®^BC3®:^yEARS;'^-^''
D^iyER-I-MSDEOAYAKAT
^
v@eAS]^i^iA^
•BII.ASEM^TEHSII.AMD DIgTEIGT
<^^ .BIL.^SPURiljC.G.),
•vs'
.NOISI-APPLICANTS STATE OF GHH4.TTISGARH AND
OTHERS- :;...-'. . : ::' :.' ';1
^I?PEICA13Q]>IF0B<S2a^lN(3(^tREGQ ^
-1::':'1' •::.':1''(:3^.M^^M2;'1^^^^^^^^^^^^
-j>' Trh<=> su3£l3.irfln.4:-nc'u"uLfc.. •+ft,I1,r 1- ,U—;4-
|XI-HC-78|114MI Sh*11<ft
3^'"i<l<llc1'i|, ®Ti1'M'l
_._ff\c^c.plz-
3^v^:(^f|6,IsK-11'tfy
j c?7(./or^ 2QO
^^) ^CG- S^^t^^|
|---|---|---|
|sii^rqirf^iR;
<IW3n^Tsb1|gwiiwgfscTsn^T|°t)[<]tfi4)-itiit)dTffte<^)'<Ri<<;i<
^isif^Tsn^r|
|B
^
;
Subhash|09.02.2007
None appearsfor the app
Mrs. Anju Ahuja,
Depu-
State'/respondents.
Two weeks
time
is gr
pointed out by the Office, fa^
dismissed for wantof prosecuti||
(y
licant.
©overnmentAdvocate for the
jinted to r-emove the default, as
ing which the matter shall stand
^n without reference to the Court.
Sd/-
SatishK.Agnihotri
Judge|
|^||^"|
'k^
P.T.O.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Kaul
State of Gujarat
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
