Allowed

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. Anand Pandey and Others

Chhattisgarh HC3 Feb 2007MA/63/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This miscellaneous appeal arose out of a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The Lok Adalat allowed the petitioners' compromise to add payments and pass an award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The appeal against respondents 1 and 2 was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 to pay Rs. 22,000 to the applicant; Appeal against respondents No.1 and 2 dismissed.

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar Vs Anand Pandey and Others — Insurance | Chhattisgarh HC (2007)

¶1

,-M1 rM fm F ,V IN THE HIGH wURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CI—IHATTISGAH'I) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No . . . . é? ./Q003

¶2

P§ELLAN3"T
7 ‘

¶3

Sanjay Kumar @ sanjeev ‘7 Kumar, aged about years s/O Phoolsingh Bhazdwaj minor representing through na tural gau^rdian fa the r Phoolsingh Bhardawa j , aged about. 35 years, 5/0 Bahoran Bharadwaj by caste Sa tnami R/O Sandari , P01 ice Station Koni Tehsil s. Dist. Bilaspur ( ChhattiSga^rh)

¶4

VERSUS

¶5

g r‘syoNDmTs

¶6

I Aana&d Pandey , aged about 32 years S/o shivkumar Pandey by profession Zip Driver R/o village s. post Ratanpur Pol ice Stat ion Ratanpur Tehs i1 4- Kota District Bilaspur (c.G.)

¶7

Smt . Seema Gahlot W/O Ramesh Gahlot R/o 27 Khan, Bilaspur Tehsil & Dist Bilaspur

¶8

( Chha^{tt isgarh)}

¶9

: 3. The New India Insurance Company L imitaa . through Branch Nana ger Branch off ice Ra jendra Nagar Chowk. Bilaspur Distt. BilaSpur (C.G.) ,/~

¶10

wv‘xf MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 1'73 OF THE MOTOR VEHIG;E V. ACT AMEE'IDED :-

¶11

¶12

HIGH COUR‘? OF CHHATTISGARH; BILA$FUR (LUK^ADALAT)

¶13

Mi$CELLANEOUS APPEAL No. $3 OF 2003

¶14

Appeuant :

¶15

Versus

¶16

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar

¶17

¶18

Respondents: Anand Pandey & Others

¶19

H o"g# -2-2$07 g;

¶20

{Arising^{outofCiaimSageNa141of290’“}

¶21

Phoolsingh Bhardwaj father of appeuaht —- Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar appears in pemon with Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, counser for the appeiiant.

¶22

None fer respondenrs’No.’l and 2r

¶23

s Shri. Sanjay Bhatt, Admn. Officer, The New India Assurance Co, Ltd. with

¶24

8hri Anand Kumar Gupta, counsei for respondent N06.

¶25

Pnooisingh Bhardwaj - father of appeilant fired an appiioatinn aiong with affidavit for permis‘sion ta compromise the matter on behaif of appeiian't/minor^—

¶26

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar,

¶27

Not opposed.

¶28

Considered. Aiiowed.

¶29

in terms of compromise; award is passed as beiow:~

¶30

1. in addition to compensation already awarded by the Tribunat respondent No.3 shati pay Rs.22.GOO/— (Rupees Twenty Two Thousand Oniy) to the appeliant.

¶31

IQ \J For disbursement and deposit in FDR, the Tribunai may pass appropriate orders.

¶32

1. The amount, if any. kept in deposit with Bank shaii be payabie underthe orders of Tribunai in accordance with iaw.

¶33

1. Appeiiant shaii be entitied to receive interest on the amount so deposited. if any.

¶34

1. in View of the above: appeal againet respondents No.1 & 2 stands dismissed.

¶35

1. Out of the above amount. Rs,220/- (Rupees Two Hundred Twenty Oniy) shaii be paid to counsel for the appellant directiy by respondent No.3 towards counsel fee.

¶36

1. tf the amount awarded is not deposited within a period of one month, the insurance Company shall be iiable to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum thereafter.

¶37

Gowri

¶38

1. Copy of ge award shy i be given to the parties free of cost.

¶39

W Sdli i I Sdl— ‘ V.K.Shrivastava Member^{~ Lok Adalat} Judge High^{CourtofChhattxsgarhi} Bilaspur

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. Anand Pandey and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. Anand Pandey and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyan Prasad Vs the Oriental Insurance Co.and Ors.

Subedar Patel and Others Vs Suresh Kumar Sen and Others

Sudha Devi Dwivedi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Vitthal Rao Vs Khodlu @ Santosh Yadav and Others

Aajuram Vs Raju Bajaj and Others

Shridhar Lal Vs Severam Sahu and Ors.