Writ petition filed by wife challenging non-acceptance of her bid in municipal plot auction held respondent had right to accept highest bid so petition dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed summarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1> M6LE
i/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C«G<)
WRFT PETITION(C) N0. .^'0 OF 2007
PETmONER $ sudha Devi Dwivedi wife of shri ^" K^K^Dwivedi,aged about 37 years» resident of near Karmchari Nagar Sikola»Darg»District-Durg(C<»G»)
VE R S U S
1< State of Chhattisgarh^ throagh secretary of Nagri Nikay D»K»s»Bha'wan,RaipurtDistrict^ Raipur»(C»G<)
RESPONDENTS
^
secretary of Nagri Nikay
^;y...' D»K»s»Bha'wan,RaipurtDistrict^
Raipur»(C»G<)
^'yy
^^y-.••*(<-''V..-a
2. Manicipal Council,
//ix$?"'
Bhilai ,Charoda »through
'%•••"""
• ^^ Manicipal Officer,Bhilai>
r^^...5 '^
V
3--;:ly7 Charoda,District-Durg(C^G^)
^' .<^.'^ 1".>^ 3o Municipal Council,Bhilai
^o
Through president,Municipal
c>^
Charoda,District-Durg(C^G^)
3o Municipal Council,Bhilai Charoda» Through president,Municipal Council,Bhilai »Charoda .District-
Darg(c<»G<»)
^i^
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE; 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
XI-HC-22
»^L.
;'.
3<y
3^T ^1141d^, ^Tfl^Ko, i^cni^y
^.ST^
^i^cii ^)*n<sb ^' 200 ^
| ^TI^T^ RFTNTW^T ^ft^^cT 5b^l<=h |
W^T^RfTW^t^T | <=hl^fd41^ ^l^dT^teT^i'<^^l< ^'3lf^RT3Tr^T |
|---|---|---|
| 02,02,2007 On being mentioned, the Shri Awadh Tripathi, counse! Shri ^S Kachhawaha, Gover State. None for other respondents. Heard. mat |
} |
|
| Respondents No.2 & 3 issued also prescribed terms and condition^ auction proceedings and gave ti^e hij auction saie. Petitioner also depo^i WQS not csccepted by respondents No ^ccording to terms and peserved the right to accept the bid and giving the highest bid for purc accepted by respondent.s No.2 <& 3 226 of the Constitution of Indi< respondents No.2 <& 3. In the result, the petition accordin9ly dismissed. co |
||
| ^HtlHHK^ padmQ |
Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.l90 | if2007 stands disposed of., _- Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge |
(^Tl^^Ra^)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bidder in an auction procured under a lease has a legal right under Article 226 to challenge non-acceptance of bid by respondent No.2 & 3.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudha Devi Dwivedi
State of Chhattisgarh through secretary of Nagri Nikay D.K.s.Bha'wan, Raipur
Municipal Council, Bhilai Charoda
Municipal Council, Bhilai
V.K. Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
