Id No. 28 of 2023 of Sh. Anil Kumar v. Iocl & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal noted the claimant's failure to appear or file a claim statement despite notices. Consequently, no hearing was conducted, and the matter was disposed of by passing a no disputant award regarding alleged illegal termination.
What did the court decide?
No disputant award was passed in favor of the claimant due to their non-appearance and failure to file claim statement.
What the court decided
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUMLABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI
ID.No. 28/2023
Sh. Anil Kumar, S/o Sh. Khajan Singh, Through-Delhi Karamchari Sangh, W-04, In Front of Kalkaji Bus Depot, Govindpuri, New Delhi-110019.
VERSUS
1. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (Marketing Division) Brijwasan, New Delhi-110061.
2. Retd. Col. Sh. Rajan Kumar, (Proprietor) Raj Kumar Rajan Security Agency, Ground Floor-04, Competent House, Plot No. 07, R.B.C. Nagal Ray, New Delhi-110046.
Appearance:
For Claimant: None
For Managements: Sh. Navin Kumar, Ld. AR for M-1.
Sh. Gyanveer Singh, Ld. AR for M-2.
AWARD
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anil Kumar
- respondent
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
Rajan Kumar Rajan Security Agency
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court