Disposed

Id No. 242 of 2017 of Sh. Ram Chandra Kumar v. Airport Authority of India

CGIT13 Sept 2024ID No. 242 of 2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal passed an award under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act regarding the illegal termination of a workman, noting the petitioner's absence and legal representatives' non-contact, resulting in a no dispute award.

What did the court decide?

No dispute award passed; matter disposed due to petitioner's absence and failure to substantiate claim.

Id No. 242 of 2017 of Sh. Ram Chandra Kumar Vs… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | CGIT (2024)

¶1

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI NO.1 NEW DELHI.

¶2

ID.No. 242/2017

¶3

Sh. Ram Chandra Kumar S/o Sh. Kishan Chand, Through Hindustan Engineering and General Mazdoor Union (Regd.) D-2/24, Sultanpuri, Delhi.

¶4

…..Workman

¶5

Versus

¶6

M/s Airport Authority of India,

¶7

Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan,

¶8

New Delhi- 110005.

¶9

M/s Spice Jet Ltd.,

¶10

Domestic Interstate Airport Terminated No.1 D, Palam Airport, New Delhi- 110037.

¶11

M/s Sun Shine Enterprises,

¶12

49, Ground Floor, Kailash Colony Metro Station Sant Nagar., New Delhi-110049.

¶13

…….Management

¶14

AWARD

¶15

This is an application under Section 2-A of the I.D. Act whereby, the applicant made prayer that his termination from the service on 31.10.2014 by the management which be declare illegal and unjustified and he be reinstated with full back wages. He has not been provided any legal facilities. When the workman went to join his job he was illegally terminated form his service on 31.10.2014 without any rhyme or reason and without conducted any domestic

¶16

enquiry by the management. He has initiated the conciliation proceeding but, no result. Hence, he had filed the present claim petition.

¶17

Management No.2 is not appearing since long therefore they are proceeded ex-parte. However, Management no.1&3 appeared and filed the rebuttal written statement. After that, rejoinder was filed and issues were framed. And after that, case was listed for claimant listed on 16.05.2024. Thereafter, the AR for the claimant informed that the claimant did not contact him for a long time. Also, the claimant is not appearing in the tribunal to substantiate his claim.

¶18

Hence, in these circumstances this tribunal has no option except to pass the no dispute award. No dispute award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is hereby send to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.

¶19

Let a copy of this Award be sent for publication as required under Section 17 of Act.

¶20

Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava Retired Judge, Allahabad High Court Presiding Officer

¶21

Date: 13.09.2024

Id No. 242 of 2017 of Sh. Ram Chandra Kumar v. Airport Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Id No. 242 of 2017 of Sh. Ram Chandra Kumar v. Airport Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Id No. 111 to 114 of 2019 of Mohd. Aftab Alam Vs Trai & Anr.

Id No. 160 of 2023 of Sh. The General Secretary Vs Celebi

Id No. 165 of 2016 of Mohd. Shakir Hussain Vs Ashok Hotel & Ors.

Id No. 184 of 2023 of Sh. The General Secretary Vs Celebi

Id No. 185 of 2019 of Sh. Suraj Dubey Vs Bwfs & Anr.

Id No. 272 of 2019 of Smt. Neelu Tanut Bai Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Id No. 271 of 2019 of Sh. Hari Prakash Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Id No. 270 of 2019 of Smt. Munni Vs University of Delhi & Anr.