Application to recall an order dismissing a writ petition for default due to the advocate's absence. The court found the explanation bonafide and sufficient, recalled the earlier order and restored the writ petition to its original file and number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA 28640 of 2014 (CAN 5 of 2026) Pratap Kr. Acharya--vs-State of West Benga 31..03.2026 ct.652, sl. 3 sk Mr. Balai Lal Sahoo …for the petitioner. Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya Ms. Keya Panja …for the W.B.B.S.E.
In re: CAN 5 of 2026
6. Let this matter appear under the heading “Fixed Matter”.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissal of the writ petition for default should be recalled and the petition restored.
Pratap Kr. Acharya
State of West Bengal
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
