Dismissal for default of an anticipatory bail application (CRM(A) 987 of 2026) filed under S. 482 BNSS 2023; petitioner unrepresented on both the current and prior (31.03.2026) hearing dates; no merits adjudicated; decided May 8, 2026 by Jay Sengupta, J.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD 86 May 8, 2026 Ct. 28
SG
CRM(A) 987 of 2026
An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And
In the matter of: XXX
… petitioner
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
No accommodation is sought.
On the last occasion, i.e., on 31.03.2026, no one represented the petitioner when the matter was called on for hearing.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
XXX
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
