Case brief
What is this about?
Cancellation of anticipatory bail refused by High Court at Calcutta (Appellate Side, CRM (M) 767 of 2026, decided 07.05.2026, Jay Sengupta, J.). De facto complainant challenged Sessions Judge, Murshidabad's order dated 17.02.2026 granting anticipatory bail to the accused (brother and his wife) in Behrampore Police Station Case No. 77 dated 11.01.2026 under Sections 318 (4), 315 (3), 79, 3 (5) BNS; FIR alleged withdrawal of entire Rs. 32 lakhs from her SBI savings account via procured signed cheques, mutual-fund transfers, ATM/cash withdrawals, and attempted murder; court found the bail order reasoned, based on case diary and documentary evidence, free of patent illegality; application dismissed, no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The grant of anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge was a reasoned order, passed after considering the contentions of the rival parties and the State and after perusing the materials in the case diary.