Dismissed¶10
Koushik Barman v. Union of India
Calcutta HCCRM (A)/895/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS 2023 (Koushik Barman, C.R.M. (A) 895 of 2026, dated 06.05.2026, Jay Sengupta, J.) dismissed for default due to non-appearance/non-representation of the petitioner on 05.05.2026 and on the hearing date; NCB represented by UOI counsel (Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Sagar Saha); no accommodation sought; certified copy to be supplied expeditiously if applied for.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default, as no one appeared for or represented the petitioner on the last occasion (05.05.2026) and again no one appeared for the petitioner on the hearing date. ¶10