Dismissed¶9

MD Kaishan Alam @ MD Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Apr 2025CRM (DB)/588/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected under Section 483 BNSS 2023; prolonged custody of 3 years 8 months; speedy/expeditious trial direction to trial court; no unnecessary adjournments; co-operation of prosecution and defence; Beniapukur Police Station Case No.326 of 2021; IPC Sections 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D; C.R.M. (DB) 588 of 2025; order dated 17.04.2025; Suvra Ghosh, J.

What did the court decide?

Considering the material available on record and the prima facie involvement of the petitioner, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. ¶9

MD Kaishan Alam @ MD Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam Vs the… — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2025)

¶1

29 17.04.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Rejected

¶2

C.R.M. (DB) 588 of 2025

¶3

In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Beniapukur Police Station Case No.326 of 2021 dated 18.08.2021 under Sections 120B/489A/489B/489C/489D of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

And In Re : Md. Kaishan Alam @ Md. Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam ... Petitioner. Mr. Sekhar Basu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avik Ghatak Mr. Fahad Imam ... for the petitioner. Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Dipankar Mahata ... for the State.

¶5

The bail prayer of the petitioner was turned down on merits on earlier occasions.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 3 year 8 months and trial has not progressed much after the earlier rejection.

¶7

Learned counsel for the State submits that there have been instances when the prosecution was unable to produce witness and also when the petitioner has sought adjournment before the learned trial Court.

¶8

Learned counsel submits that 4 more witnesses are left to be examined and trial shall be concluded within three months from the next date of evidence fixed before the learned trial Court subject to co operation of the petitioner.

¶9

Considering the material available on record and prima facie involvement of the petitioner the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

¶10

¶11

The learned trial Court is directed to take the proceeding to its logical conclusion in the light of the submission made on behalf of the State without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, in accordance with law. It is expected that the prosecution as well as the defence shall render utmost co operation in expeditious conclusion of the trial.

¶12

The application for bail is thus disposed of.

¶13

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶14

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶15

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

MD Kaishan Alam @ MD Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Kaishan Alam @ MD Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sazimuddin Mia@Saji Miah@ Sajimuddin Miah Vs the State of West Bengal

Lalu Sk @ Sujarul Sk @ Sekh Vs State of West Bengal

MD Iftikar @ Shahruk Vs the State of West Bengal

Bidyut Sikdar Vs the State of West Bengal

MD Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari Vs State of West Bengal

Sahajan Mondal @ Laltu Mondal Vs the State of West Bengal