Dismissed

MD Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Apr 2025CRM (DB)/378/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court rejected the renewal of bail prayer by a petitioner implicated in a murder case under Sections 302/498A IPC. Finding no change of circumstances from earlier dismissal, the Court dismissed the application, directed the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously, and returned the case diary.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected; application disposed; case diary returned to trial court with direction to conclude trial expeditiously.

MD Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari Vs… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2025)

¶1

17.04.2025

¶2

8 jb. jdt.

¶3

C.R.M. (DB) 378 of 2025

¶4

In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Manikchak Police Station Case No. 288 of 2024 dated 18.04.2024 under Sections 498A/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

And

¶6

In Re : Md. Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari

¶7

... Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati Ms. Swastika Chowdhury ... For the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Saibal Bapuli Ms. Sima Biswas

¶10

... For the State.

¶11

Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶13

Bail prayer of the petitioner was turned down by this Court on merits on 7^th October, 2024. The petitioner renews his prayer.

¶14

It appears from the evidence on record that one of the daughters of the victim has prima facie implicated the petitioner for death of her mother. Though the petitioner insists that the victim died as a result of road traffic accident evidence on record does not support the said claim.

¶15

There is no change of circumstance after rejection of the earlier prayer of the petitioner which warrants a favourable order at this stage.

¶16

Considering the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence as well as gravity of offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

¶17

The application for bail is disposed of.

¶18

¶19

Case diary be returned.

¶20

However, considering the period of detention of the petitioner learned trial Court is directed to take the proceeding to its logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶21

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶22

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶23

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

MD Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sazimuddin Mia@Saji Miah@ Sajimuddin Miah Vs the State of West Bengal

Lalu Sk @ Sujarul Sk @ Sekh Vs State of West Bengal

MD Iftikar @ Shahruk Vs the State of West Bengal

Bidyut Sikdar Vs the State of West Bengal

MD Kaishan Alam @ MD Kaishna Alam @ Kausum Alam Vs the State of West Bengal

Sahajan Mondal @ Laltu Mondal Vs the State of West Bengal