Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn due to incurable defects, with leave granted to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 30.07.2024 d.p.
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
W.P.A 28276 of 2023
Pritilata Nayek -versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Madhumita Patra. …For the Petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Sagnik Chatterjee. …For the State.
Mr. Ranjan Saha.
…For DPSC, South 24-Pgs.
On a perusal of the writ petition it appears that there are several incurable defects.
On the prayer of the learned advocate for the petitioner the instant writ petition stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
Leave is granted to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition on the selfsame cause of action with proper and better particulars.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Pritilata Nayek
The State of West Bengal
DPSC, South 24-Pgs
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
